Trump tariffs

From TRUMPipedia - The Online TRUMP Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Trump tariffs are a series of United States tariffs imposed during the presidency of Donald Trump as part of his "America First" economic policy to reduce the United States trade deficit by shifting American trade policy from multilateral free trade agreements to bilateral trade deals. In January 2018, Trump imposed tariffs on solar panels and washing machines of 30 to 50 percent.[1] In March 2018 he imposed tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) from most countries,[2][3] which, according to Morgan Stanley, covered an estimated 4.1 percent of U.S. imports.[4] On June 1, 2018, this was extended to the European Union, Canada, and Mexico.[3] On July 6, 2018, in a separate move aimed at China, the Trump administration set a tariff of 25 percent on 818 categories of goods imported from China worth $50 billion, which led to China accusing the U.S. of instigating a trade war.[5]

The tariffs angered trading partners, who implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods.[6] In June 2018, India planned to recoup trade penalties of $241 million on $1.2 billion worth of Indian steel and aluminum,[7] but attempted talks delayed these until June 2019 when India imposed retaliatory tariffs on $240 million worth of U.S. goods.[8] Canada imposed matching retaliatory tariffs on July 1, 2018.[9][10] China implemented retaliatory tariffs equivalent to the $34 billion tariff imposed on it by the U.S.[11] Other countries, such as Australia, expressed concern over the consequences of a trade war.[12] In July 2018, the Trump administration announced it would use a Great Depression-era program, the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), to pay farmers up to $12 billion. This government assistance program aims to make up a shortfall as farmers lose sales abroad due to the trade war and retaliatory tariffs from the European Union and other states.[13]

After extensive trade talks with China ended without an agreement on May 10, 2019, President Trump raised the tariffs on another $200 billion in Chinese imports from 10% to 25%. China retaliated three days later, announcing new tariffs on $60 billion of American exports.[14][15] Additional tariffs on another $300 billion in Chinese goods were being considered, pending a USTR hearing and a public comment period in June 2019.[16] In May 2019, the Trump administration increased the direct CCC payments by $14.5 billion, plus another $1.6 billion in related aid, to further offset the impact of the tariffs on American farmers.[17] An additional $16 billion in farm aid was allocated in July 2019.[18]

Tariff negotiations in North America were relatively more successful, with the U.S. lifting the steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico on May 20, 2019, joining Australia and Argentina in being the only nations exempted from the regulations.[19][20] However, on May 30, Trump unilaterally announced his intention to impose a 5 percent tariff on all imports from Mexico beginning on June 10, with tariffs increasing to 10 percent on July 1, and by another 5 percent each month for three months, "until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP," adding illegal immigration as a condition for U.S.-Mexico tariff negotiations. The move was seen as threatening the ratification of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), the North American trade deal set to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).[21] The tariffs were averted on June 7.[22]

A May 2019 analysis conducted by CNBC found Trump's tariffs are equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in the U.S. in decades.[23][24][25][26]

Background[edit | edit source]

File:Average Tariff Rates in USA (1821-2016).png
Average Tariff Rates in the U.S. (1821–2016)

Trump adopted his current views on trade issues in the 1980s, saying Japan and other nations were taking advantage of the United States.[27] During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly favored policy proposals that renegotiate trade agreements for the United States. During a meeting with the New York Times Editorial Board in January 2016, Trump said that he would tax Chinese imports into the United States by 45%.[28] Trump frequently criticized the North American Free Trade Agreement calling it "the worst trade deal the U.S. has ever signed".[29] He also called Trans-Pacific Partnership "the death blow for American manufacturing" and that it would "put the interests of foreign countries above our own".[30]

Policy[edit | edit source]

On November 21, 2016, in a video message, Trump introduced an economic strategy of "putting America first", stating that he would negotiate "fair, bilateral trade deals that bring jobs and industry back onto American shores". On January 23, 2017, three days after becoming president, Trump withdrew the United States from the politically divisive Trans-Pacific Partnership believing that the agreement would "undermine" the U.S. economy and sovereignty.[31][32][33][34]

Trump has also indicated a desire to end the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico. His administration has renegotiated the terms of the agreement. Trump had threatened to withdraw from it if negotiations fail.[35] He has specifically criticized the Ford Motor Co.,[36] Carrier Corporation,[36] and Mondelez International for having operations based in Mexico.[36][37][38] In August 2015, in response to Oreo maker Mondelez International's announcement that it would move manufacturing to Mexico, Trump said that he would boycott Oreos.[38] The new deal increases the percentage of parts and manufacturing that must be done in North America for domestic automobiles, set a minimum wage for some workers on auto parts, and expanded access for U.S. dairy sales to Canada.[39]

Similar to his approach to trade deals, Trump also pledged, as part of the Contract with the American Voter, to impose tariffs to discourage companies from laying off workers or relocating to other countries, through an "End the Offshoring Act".[40][41][42] No such act has been introduced in Congress,[43][44][45] but Trump has moved to impose tariffs on solar panels, washing machines, steel, and aluminum. The enforcement of the tariffs falls primarily within the purview of the Department of Commerce and Office of the United States Trade Representative.

Trump has repeatedly promised to lower America's trade deficit, and has argued for a renegotiation of trade deals and imposition of tariffs to that end.[46][47] These efforts notwithstanding, during 2018 the trade deficit continued to increase.[47]

In November 2018, Trump argued that the tariffs enriched the United States. He said that the United States was gaining "Billions of Dollars" from "Tariffs being charged to China". He added, "If companies don’t want to pay Tariffs, build in the U.S.A. Otherwise, lets just make our Country richer than ever before!" Fact-checkers and economists described the assertions made by Trump as false, with the Associated Press writing "Almost all economists say the president is wrong. That’s because tariffs are taxes on imports. They can cause higher prices, reduce trade among countries and hurt overall economic growth as a result."[48][49]

Legal aspects[edit | edit source]

File:U.S. Trade Balance (1895–2015) and Trade Policies.png
U.S. Trade Balance and Trade Policy (1895–2015)

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States of America states, that "Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises". But Congress has repeatedly shifted its powers regarding tariffs to the president.[50] Beginning in 1917 with the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 the president can impose any tariff while the nation is at war. The affected trade does not have to be connected to the ongoing war. Since 1974 the Trade Act of 1974 allows the president to impose a 15% tariff for 150 days if there is “an adverse impact on national security from imports.” After 150 days the tariff expires unless extended by Congress. In 1977 the International Emergency Economic Powers Act shifted powers even more towards the White House. The Trump administration claims that it gives the President the authority to raise tariffs without any limits during a national emergency of any kind. Legal scholars disagree because the IEEPA does not mention tariffs at all and transfers no authority of tariffs towards the President.[51] The American Chamber of Commerce is considering suing.

Enacted tariffs[edit | edit source]

File:Average Tariff Rates on manufactured products.png
Historical average Tariff Rates on manufactured products

Solar panels[edit | edit source]

On January 23, 2018, news outlets announced that Trump had imposed tariffs on solar panels produced outside the United States. The tariffs initially start at 30% and will gradually fall to 15% in four years.[52][53] The first 2.5 gigawatts of solar cells imported each year will be exempted from the tariff.[54]

Tariffs on Solar Panels[54]
Components Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Safeguard Tariff on Modules and Cells 30% 25% 20% 15%
Cells Exempted from Tariff 2.5 gigawatts 2.5 gigawatts 2.5 gigawatts 2.5 gigawatts

China is currently the world leader in solar panel manufacture, and has decried the tariffs.[55] Zhong Shan, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said in a statement, "With regard to the wrong measures taken by the United States, China will work with other W.T.O. members to resolutely defend our legitimate interests."[56]

Washing machines[edit | edit source]

On January 23, 2018, in conjunction with the tariffs placed on solar panels, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative announced tariffs on washing machines.[54] According to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), imports of large residential washers increased "steadily" from 2012 to 2016, and that domestic producers' financial performance "declined precipitously".[57] In the first year, the tariffs start at 20% for the first 1.2 million units of imported finished washers, and all subsequent washers within that year will have a 50% tariff. By the third year initial tariff will go down to 16-40%, following the same pattern.

The tariffs came after a petition was filed by Whirlpool, a U.S.-based washing machine manufacturer facing tough competition from LG Electronics and Samsung both based in South Korea.[58]

Tariffs on washing machines[54]
Components Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
First 1.2 million units of imported finished washers 20% 18% 16%
All subsequent imports of finished washers 50% 45% 40%
Tariff on covered parts 50% 45% 40%
Covered parts excluded from tariff 50,000 units 70,000 units 90,000 units

In 2016, China exported $425 million worth of washers to the United States, followed by Mexico with $240 million, and South Korean companies $130 million.[57] Samsung and LG are among the top exporters of washers to the United States. Two weeks before the tariff announcement, Samsung had moved its production of washing machines to a new plant in South Carolina. In response Samsung said U.S. consumers will "pay more, with fewer choices". Mexican officials said they would respond to the tariffs during the ongoing NAFTA renegotiations.[59]

Steel and aluminum[edit | edit source]

On March 1, 2018 Trump announced his intention to impose a 25% tariff on steel and a 10% tariff on aluminum imports.[60] In a tweet the next day, Trump asserted, "Trade wars are good, and easy to win."[61] On March 8, he signed an order to impose the tariffs effective after 15 days.[2] The EU, Canada, Mexico, Australia, Argentina, Brazil and South Korea were temporarily exempted from the order under a carve-out provision.[62] Canada, Mexico, and the EU became subject to the steel and aluminium tariffs later in an announcement on May 31, 2018.[2][63][64] The U.S., Canada, and Mexico would reach a deal to remove the steel and aluminum tariffs in May 2019, almost a year after going into effect.[65]

Permanent exemption from the Steel tariff[edit | edit source]

While the 25% steel tariff as a rule applies to all countries worldwide, there are nevertheless four countries that successfully negotiated a permanent exemption from the steel tariff with the Trump administration.[66][67][68] Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull successfully lobbied President Trump to get an exemption at the 2017 G20 Hamburg summit, arguing that "[w]e do this steel that’s specialty steel. We’re the only one that produces it in the world. You’ve got to let us out. You’ve got a $40 billion trade surplus with us. We’re military allies with you. We’re in every battle with you.”[69]

Country Date granted
 South Korea March 28, 2018
 Argentina May 2, 2018
 Australia May 2, 2018
 Brazil May 2, 2018

Legal basis and challenges[edit | edit source]

The legal basis cited in Trump's tariff order is Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 which under certain circumstances allows the president to impose tariffs based on the recommendation from the U.S. Secretary of Commerce if "an article is being imported into the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten or impair the national security."[70] This section is rarely used,[70] and has never been invoked since the World Trade Organization was established in 1995.[71]

China initiated a WTO complaint against the U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs on April 9, 2018.[72] The EU opened a similar WTO case on June 1, 2018.[73]

On June 9, 2018, Trump tweeted a statement addressing Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau in which he said that American tariffs targeting Canada "are in response to his [tariffs] of 270% on dairy!"[74] In the tweet, Trump did not cite national security, the legal basis for implementing the tariff.[75][76]

Economic and trade analysis[edit | edit source]

File:Effect of free trade on surplus v1.png
Opening trade to imports lowers the price from Pa to Pw and increases the quantity from Qa to Ct. This increases consumer surplus (the area under the demand curve but above price) by X+Z as consumers can purchase more goods at lower prices. However, it also reduces producer surplus (the area above the supply curve but below the price) by X, as domestic producers supply fewer goods at lower prices. Domestic producers will choose to produce at Qt, with the quantity gap between Qt and Ct filled by imports. This overall gain from free trade is area Z, although there are winners (consumers) and losers (domestic firms and their employees).[77]
File:Effect of Import Tariff - v1.png
Diagram showing effects of an import tariff, which hurts domestic consumers more than domestic producers are helped. Higher prices and lower quantities reduce consumer surplus (the area above price but under the demand curve) by areas A+B+C+D, while expanding producer surplus (the area below price but above the supply curve) by A and government revenue by C (the import quantity times the tariff price.) Areas B and D are dead-weight losses, surplus lost by consumers and overall.[77]

A survey of leading economists by the Initiative on Global Markets at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business showed a consensus that imposing new US tariffs on steel and aluminum will not improve Americans’ welfare.[78] Economists say that the tariffs will lead to more harm than gains, as the price for steel increases, which will harm consumers and Americans working in manufacturing industries that use steel (these jobs outnumber those who work in steel-producing sectors by 80 to 1).[79][80][81] The big winners of the tariffs are some American steel- and aluminum-producing industries; some of the producers (especially small- and middle-sized ones) who are reliant on foreign inputs may struggle as a result of the tariffs.[81][82][83] A study of the proposal indicated that it would lead to an estimated loss of 146,000 jobs.[84] Studies of the 2002 steel tariffs enacted by the Bush administration show that they caused more job losses than job gains.[79] Jobs losses could be even greater if other countries retaliate against the United States with their own tariffs on various American products.[85]

Scholars warned that the Trump administration's use of "national security" rationales[86] (these have not been commonly used by past administrations) for the tariffs could undermine the international trading order, as other states could use the same rationales for their own tariffs.[79][87][81][88] The WTO allows states to take actions necessary to ensure their national security, but this provision has been sparsely used, given that it could be abused.[89] Whereas national security reasons were cited for the tariffs, it has been noted that tariffs primarily harm American allies, not enemies; the United States imports very little steel and aluminum from China directly.[90] Trade experts furthermore noted that the United States already produces more than two-thirds of its own steel.[88]

Forty-five U.S. trade associations are urging Trump not to impose tariffs on China, warning it would be "particularly harmful" to the U.S. economy and consumers.[91]

The National Retail Federation has been vocal in its opposition of the tariffs. The NRF also launched an ad campaign with Ben Stein, who reprised his role as the economics teacher from “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” arguing that tariffs are bad economics and hurt consumers.[92][93][94]

General Motors announced closure of plants in Maryland, Michigan, Ohio, and Ontario, and cutting over 14,000 jobs, citing steel tariffs as a factor.[95][96] Trump expressed frustration with the decision.[97]

Domestic political response[edit | edit source]

Domestically, reactions from elected officials often varied among regional lines rather than ideological lines.[98] The tariffs have seen widespread criticism from conservatives and Republicans.[99][100][101] However, the Republican-controlled Congress has thus far declined to take any action to counter Trump's imposition of tariffs.[102][103] Speaker Paul Ryan said that Congress would not pass any tariff legislation that Trump would veto.[102]

Reception was mixed among Democratic officials,[104] with Democrats from Rust Belt states voicing support for tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.[105]

The AFL-CIO, the largest labor union in the U.S., praised Trump for the tariffs, as did Democratic Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown, who said that the action would be a boon for "steel plants across Ohio". Many congressional Republicans expressed fear that the tariffs might damage the economy or lead to retaliatory tariffs from other countries. Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell urged Trump to rethink his proposal or to target the tariffs more narrowly so as to avoid "unintended consequences and collateral damage".[106] House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, while calling for strategic and targeted actions against "trade cheaters," criticized Trump's rollout of the tariffs, calling it "chaotic" and that it was "maximizing the collateral damage to American workers, consumers and our international alliances".[107] The proposal drew comparisons to a tariff imposed by his Republican presidential predecessor, George W. Bush;[108] in 2002 the U.S. imposed heavy steel tariffs that were largely seen as ineffectual or even harmful to the U.S., and were withdrawn after 18 months.[109]

On March 6, 2018, Gary Cohn, chair of the National Economic Council, announced his intention to resign; the announcement followed Trump's cancellation of a meeting with end-users of steel and aluminum that Cohn had arranged in an attempt to dissuade the president from the planned tariffs.[110]

A March 2018 Quinnipiac University poll showed widespread disapproval of the tariffs, with only 29% of Americans agreeing with a "25% tariff on steel imports and a 10% tariff on aluminum imports" if it raised their cost of living.[111]

On June 13, 2019, 661 American companies sent a letter to Trump urging him to resolve the trade dispute with China. The letter was one of many sent on behalf of Tariffs Hurt the Heartland, an organization of over 150 trade groups representing agriculture, manufacturing, retailing and technology companies.[112][113]

Lifting of steel and aluminum tariffs[edit | edit source]

On May 17, 2019, the U.S. reached a deal to lift the steel and aluminum tariffs on Mexico and Canada. Lifting the tariffs were seen as helping pave the way for further ratification of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement. According to a joint statement, the Canadian and the U.S. governments said the U.S. will scrap the metals duties within two days of the deal. Canada will remove tariffs levied on American goods in retaliation for the steel and aluminum duties. The countries will also drop all pending litigation in the World Trade Organization related to the tariffs, set up measures to "prevent the importation of aluminum or steel that is unfairly subsidized and/or sold at dumped prices" and "prevent the transshipment of aluminum and steel made outside of Canada or the United States to the other country" and make an "agreed-upon process for monitoring aluminum and steel trade between them". In a separate statement, the Mexican government also said it would remove retaliatory tariffs it put on the U.S. and cease pending litigation. Mexico also said it would set up measures to stop unfair trade practices in the aluminum and steel markets and to monitor trade of the metals in North America.[20]

Along with the deal with Canada and Mexico, President Trump also postponed a decision on whether to impose tariffs on automobiles imported from Europe, Japan and other countries for six months.[65]

Chinese products[edit | edit source]

File:United States Balance of Trade Deficit-pie chart.svg
U.S. trade deficit (in billions, goods only) by country in 2014
File:U.S. trade deficit in 2017.jpg
U.S. trade deficit (in billions, goods and services) by country in 2017

On March 22, 2018, Trump signed a memorandum under the Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, instructing the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to apply tariffs of $50 billion on Chinese goods. Trump stated that the tariffs would be imposed due to Chinese theft of U.S intellectual property.[114] Trump said that his planned tariffs on Chinese imports would make the United States "a much stronger, much richer nation".[115] However, the steps toward imposing the tariffs led to increased concerns of a global trade war.[114]

The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 724 points, or 2.9%, after the tariffs were announced due to concerns over a trade war.[116] Corporations that traded with China, such as Caterpillar Inc.and Boeing suffered large losses in their stock price.[117]

In response, the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China announced plans to implement its own tariffs on 128 U.S. products. 120 of those products, such as fruit and wine, will be taxed at a 15% duty while the remaining 8 products, including pork, will receive a 25% tariff.[118][119] China implemented their tariffs on April 2, 2018.[120][121]

On April 3, 2018, the U.S. Trade Representative's office published an initial list of 1,300+ Chinese goods to impose levies upon, including products like flat-screen televisions, weapons, satellites, medical devices, aircraft parts and batteries.[122][123][124] Chinese Ambassador Cui Tiankai responded by warning the US that they may fight back, saying "We have done the utmost to avoid this kind of situation, but if the other side makes the wrong choice, then we have no alternative but to fight back."[125]

On April 4, 2018, China's Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council decided to announce a plan of additional tariffs of 25% on 106 items of products including automobiles, airplanes, and soybeans.[126] Soybeans are the top U.S. agricultural export to China.[127][128]

The increased tit-for-tat tariff announcements stoked fears that the two countries are inching closer to a trade war.[129][130][131] On April 4, 2018, President Trump responded to speculation tweeting: "We are not in a trade war with China, that war was lost many years ago by the foolish, or incompetent, people who represented the U.S. Now we have a Trade Deficit of $500 Billion a year, with Intellectual Property Theft of another $300 Billion. We cannot let this continue!"[132] The next day Trump directed the USTR to consider $100 billion in additional tariffs.[133][134]

On May 9, 2018, China cancelled soybean orders exported from United States to China. Zhang Xiaoping, Chinese director for the U.S. Soybean Export Council, said that Chinese buyers simply stopped buying from the U.S.[135]

On June 15, Donald Trump released a list of $34 billion of Chinese goods to face a 25% tariff, starting on July 6. Another list with $16 billion of Chinese goods was released, with an implementation date of August 23.[136]

On July 10, the United States Trade Representative, in reaction to China's retaliatory tariffs that took effect July 6, requested comments, gave notice of public hearings and issued a proposed list of Chinese products amounting to an annual trade value of about $200 billion that would be subjected to an additional 10% in duties on top of what those imported articles would normally pay.[137]

In 2018 China ended its domestic ownership rules for auto companies and financial institutions. The rules required that auto companies and financial institutions in China be at least 50 percent owned by Chinese companies. The change was seen as benefitting U.S. auto companies including Tesla.[138][139]

On May 9, 2019, Trump stated that the tariffs are "paid for mostly by China, by the way, not by us." Economic analysts concluded this was an incorrect assertion as American businesses and consumers ultimately pay the tariffs as real-world examples of tariffs working as intended are rare, and consumers of the tariff-levying country are the primary victims of tariffs, by having to pay higher prices. "It is inaccurate to say that countries pay tariffs on commercial and consumer goods — it is the buyers and sellers that bear the costs," said Ross Burkhart, a Boise State University political scientist. "Purchasers pay the tariff when they buy popular products. Sellers lose market share when their products get priced out of markets," Burkhart added.[140][141][142]

During the June 2019 G20 Osaka summit, China and America agreed to resume stalled trade talks, with Trump announcing he would suspend an additional $300 billion in tariffs that had been under consideration after talks failed the previous month, and asserting China had agreed to buy a "tremendous amount" of American farm products, although there were no specifics or confirmation of this by China. People familiar with the negotiations later said China made no explicit commitment as Trump had described.[143][144][145]

South Korean products[edit | edit source]

On March 28, 2018 the United States and South Korea announced major changes to the bilateral United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) in response to the numerous tariffs and the proposed North Korean-United States diplomatic meeting.[146] The 25 percent tariff on South Korean trucks will be extended until 2041, adding twenty years to the current 2021 target phase out date. No South Korean auto manufacturer exports trucks to the United States. The United States exempted South Korea from its steel tariffs, but imposed an import quota of about 2.68 million tonnes.[147][148] South Korea was temporarily exempted from aluminum tariffs as well, but the exemption was removed effective May 1, 2018.[149]

Response from trade partners[edit | edit source]

File:Average tariff rates (France, UK, US).png
Historical average Tariff Rates (France, UK, U.S.)

China, Canada, and the European Union responded negatively to the initial announcement (which did not mention any temporary exemptions). Canada supplies 16% of U.S. demand for steel, followed by Brazil at 13%, South Korea at 10%,[150] Mexico at 9%, and China at 2%.[108]

Canadian retaliatory tariffs[edit | edit source]

From 2013 to 2016, Canada was the largest source of aluminum imports to the U.S.[151][152]

Trump invoked national security grounds as justification for imposing tariffs on Canada. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said that this was "absurd" and stated: "That Canada could be considered a national security risk to the United States is inconceivable...Let me be clear, these tariffs are totally unacceptable." He announced $16.6 billion in retaliatory tariffs, stating that "American people are not the target ... We hope eventually that common sense will triumph. Unfortunately the actions taken today by the United States government do not appear headed in that direction."[153]

On July 1, 2018, Canada implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports.[9] The value of the Canadian tariffs were set to match the value of the U.S. tariffs dollar-for-dollar and cover 299 U.S. goods, including steel, aluminum, and a variety of other products, including inflatable boats, yogurt, whiskies, candles, and sleeping bags before the tariffs were lifted on May 20, 2019.[10][65]

Chinese retaliatory tariffs[edit | edit source]

China said that it will retaliate for the tariffs imposed on $50 billion of Chinese goods that came into effect on July 6.[12] China threatened to curb imports of U.S. soybeans.[154]

A June 2019 analysis conducted by the Peterson Institute for International Economics found that China imposed the same 8% average tariffs on all countries in January 2018, but by June 2019 average tariffs on American exports had increased to 20.7% while those on other countries had declined to 6.7%[155]

European Union retaliatory tariffs[edit | edit source]

Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European Commission, condemned U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs and announced that a legal challenge at the World Trade Organization would follow.[156] The EU filed the WTO challenge against the United States on June 1, once the tariffs took effect.[157]

European Union retaliatory tariffs took effect on June 22, 2018, imposing tariffs on 180 types of products, over $3 billion of U.S. goods. Affected products include steel and aluminum, agricultural goods (including orange juice and cranberry juice), clothing, washing machines, cosmetics, and boats.[158] European Commissioner for Trade Cecilia Malmström stated: "The rules of international trade, which we have developed ... with our American partners, cannot be violated without a reaction from our side. Our response is measured, proportionate and fully in line with WTO rules."[158] Among the U.S. manufacturers affected by the EU's responsive tariffs is Harley-Davidson, which announced that it would move some of their manufacturing out of the United States.[159]

Indian retaliatory tariffs[edit | edit source]

On June 16, 2019 India imposed retaliatory tariffs on 28 U.S. products, $240 million worth of goods, with some levies reaching 70 percent. Affected products include apples, almonds, walnuts, lentils, and some chemical products; India is the largest buyer of U.S. almonds, paying $543 million for more than half of the imports. It's also the second-largest buyer of U.S. apples, buying $156 million worth in 2018.[8] The tariffs were in response to the U.S.'s refusal to exempt India from higher taxes on steel and aluminum imports and in response to the U.S. withdrawing India from the Generalized System of Preferences on June 5. India had announced retaliatory tariff increases totaling $235 million on U.S. goods in June 2018, but trade talks had delayed their implementation.[160]

Mexican retaliatory tariffs[edit | edit source]

In response to the imposition of U.S. tariffs, Mexico implemented retaliatory tariffs on around $3 billion worth of U.S. goods. These Mexican tariffs, which went into effect on June 5, 2018 were imposed on U.S. steel, pork, cheese, whiskey, and apples, among other goods before being lifted on May 20, 2019.[9][161][65]

Proposed tariffs[edit | edit source]

Automobiles[edit | edit source]

During his presidential campaign, Trump said he would impose tariffs—between 15 to 35%—on companies that moved their operations to Mexico.[37] Trump proposed a 35% tariff on "every car, every truck and every part manufactured in Ford's Mexico plant that comes across the border".[162] Tariffs at that level would be far higher than the international norms (which are around 2.67% for the U.S. and most other advanced economies and under 10% for most developing countries).[163] After the European Union threatened to impose retaliatory tariffs should a tariff on steel and aluminum be imposed, on March 3, 2018 Trump countered with a threat to impose tariffs on European car manufacturers.[164] In May 2019, Trump threatened to impose tariffs of up to 25 percent on automobiles and parts on the basis that a weakening internal U.S. economy constituted a national security threat, but delayed the imposition of the tariffs for six months to allow for trade talks with the European Union and Japan.[165][166][167]

All Mexican imports[edit | edit source]

On May 30, 2019, Trump unexpectedly announced that he would impose a 5% tariff on all imports from Mexico on June 10, increasing to 10% on July 1, and by another 5% each month for three months, “until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP.”[168] Hours later, Republican senator Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, commented, “This is a misuse of presidential tariff authority and counter to congressional intent. Following through on this threat would seriously jeopardize passage of USMCA, a central campaign pledge of President Trump’s and what could be a big victory for the country."[169] That same day, the Trump administration formally initiated the process to seek congressional approval of USMCA.[170] Trump's top trade advisor, US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, opposed the new Mexican tariffs on concerns it would jeopardize passage of USMCA.[171] Treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin and Trump senior advisor Jared Kushner also opposed the action. Grassley, whose committee is instrumental in passing USMCA, was not informed in advance of Trump’s surprise announcement.[172] An array of lawmakers and business groups expressed consternation about the proposed tariffs.[171][173] With 2018 imports of Mexican goods totaling $346.5 billion, a 5% tariff constitutes a tax increase of over $17 billion.[174]

On the evening of June 7, Trump announced that the planned Mexico tariffs were "indefinitely suspended" after Mexico agreed to take stronger measures to curb immigration across the border of the U.S. According to the deal, Mexico agreed to deploy 6,000 of its National Guard troops throughout the country, with a focus on its southern border with Guatemala. Mexico also agreed to house migrants seeking asylum in the U.S. — including housing, offering jobs, health care and education — while the U.S. agreed to accelerate asylum claims. If the deal does not have the "expected results," then the 2 nations will meet again in 90 days.[22] Trump also tweeted that Mexico had agreed to "immediately" begin buying agricultural products from U.S. farmers, although the communique between the countries did not mention any such deal and Mexican officials were reportedly not aware of such discussions; American officials declined to comment.[175] The New York Times reported the following day that Mexico had already agreed to most of the actions months prior.[176] On June 9, as critics continued to downplay the significance of the deal, Trump called the The New York Times report "false", tweeting "We have been trying to get some of these Border Actions for a long time...but were not able to get them, or get them in full, until our signed agreement with Mexico." The Times stood by its reporting.[177] Trump also threatened that he could return to using tariffs as a tactic if desired. Mexico's ambassador to the U.S., Martha Bárcena Coqui, addressed Trump's defense of the deal on CBS, saying "There are a lot of details that we discussed during the negotiations...that we didn’t put into the declaration because there are different paths that we have to follow," adding that adjustments will be made as the situation on the border evolves.[178]

Effects[edit | edit source]

The Trump administration's tariffs were received negatively by the majority of economists and analysts, with general consensus among experts – including U.S. Director of the National Economic Council Larry Kudlow – being that the tariffs either have no direct benefits on the U.S. economy and GDP growth or they have a small to moderately negative impact on the economy.[140][179][180] In a March 2018 Reuters survey, almost 80% of 60 economists believed the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports would be a net harm to the U.S. economy, with the rest believing that the tariffs would have little or no effect; none of the economists surveyed believed that the tariffs would benefit the U.S. economy.[181] In May 2018, more than 1,000 economists wrote a letter warning Trump about the dangers of pursuing a trade war, arguing that the tariffs were echoing Great Depression-era policies.[182]

Economic impact[edit | edit source]

Between President Trump's 2017 inauguration and 2019, the U.S.'s trade deficit had grown by $119 billion. In March 2019, the U.S. Department of Commerce stated that in 2018 the trade deficit reached $621 billion, the highest it had been since 2008.[183]

Two working papers by economists in March 2019 estimated that the retaliatory tariffs were costing the U.S. economy billions in revenue. The first paper estimated losses of $68.8 billion to consumers and producers due to higher prices. The total effect, accounting for the benefits of higher prices to U.S. producers and government revenue from tariffs, was estimated to be $7.8 billion. Among the distribution of losses across sectors and counties, they analyzed that workers in tradeable sectors in heavily Republican counties were especially affected.[184][185]

The second paper estimated that there was "complete pass-through" from the tariffs to consumer prices, implying that the full burden of the tariff was on U.S. consumers and importers. The economists estimated the reduction in real income due to deadweight loss to be $1.4 billion per month. They also observed that, in countries that imposed retaliatory tariffs against the U.S., there was complete pass-through from retaliatory tariffs to prices of U.S.-exported goods – implying that the full burden of the retaliatory tariffs was on consumers and importers in retaliating countries.[186][185]

An April 2019 working paper by economists found that the tariffs on washing machines caused the prices of washers to increase by approximately 12 percent in the United States.[187]

According to an analysis by Peterson Institute for International Economics economists, American businesses and consumers paid more than $900,000 a year for each job that was created or saved as a result of the Trump administration's tariffs on steel and aluminum.[188] The cost for each job saved as a result of the administration's tariffs on washing machines was $815,000.[188]

Analysis conducted by CNBC in May 2019 found that Trump "enacted tariffs equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in decades," while Tax Foundation and Tax Policy Center analyses found the tariffs could offset the benefits of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for many households.[23][24][25][26] The Tax Foundation found that if all existing and proposed tariffs were fully implemented, the benefits of the Trump tax cut would be completely eliminated for all taxpayers through the 90th percentile in earnings.[189]

Analysis conducted by Deutsche Bank estimated that Trump's trade actions had resulted in foregone American stock market capitalization of $5 trillion through May 2019.[190]

Calling the Trump tariffs "an extraordinary abuse of taxing authority," a May 2019 analysis conducted by the National Taxpayers Union found that the existing and proposed additional tariffs, if fully implemented, would constitute the largest tax increase of the post-war era.[191]

Political impact[edit | edit source]

University of Warwick economists found evidence implying the tariffs negatively impacted the electorate in districts that swung to Trump (relative to Mitt Romney's 2012 performance), and that as a result of the retaliatory tariffs, "Republican candidates fared worse by between 1.4 - 2.7 percentage points in counties that are in the top decile of the exposure distribution implied by the Chinese, Canadian and Mexican retaliation."[192][193][194] The analysis also found that the retaliatory tariffs implemented by the EU were carefully structured so as to not harm the EU itself, whereas China implemented tariffs that harmed industries in both China and the US.[192][193][194]

The Asian Trade Centre commented that Trump's usage of trade policy as a tactic to push non-trade related political initiatives – particularly his May 2019 threat to levy Mexican imports until they crackdown on illegal immigration – set a negative precedent for future U.S. presidents and damaged the credibility of the U.S. as a reliable trade partner.[195]

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Gonzales, Richard (January 22, 2018). "Trump Slaps Tariffs On Imported Solar Panels and Washing Machines". NPR. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Horsley, Scott (March 8, 2018). "Trump Formally Orders Tariffs on Steel, Aluminum Imports". NPR. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 Long, Heather (May 31, 2018). "Trump has officially put more tariffs on U.S. allies than on China". The Washington Post. 
  4. Chance, David (March 5, 2018). "Trump's trade tariffs: Long on rhetoric, short on impact?". Reuters. 
  5.; "As Trump’s trade war starts, China retaliates with comparable tariffs of its own". Washington Post. Retrieved 2018-07-06. 
  6. "US tariffs a dangerous game, says EU". BBC News. June 1, 2018. 
  7. "India moves ahead with tariffs on US goods". CNN. June 17, 2018. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 "India imposing increased, retaliatory tariffs on US exports including apples, almonds". USA Today. 16 June 2019. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Kate Rooney, Canada makes retaliatory tariffs official: 'We will not back down', CNBC (June 29, 2018).
  10. 10.0 10.1 Daniel Wolfe, The full list of 229 US products targeted by Canada’s retaliatory tariffs, Quartz (June 29, 2018).
  11. Lawder, David. "Trump sets tariffs on $50 billion in Chinese goods; Beijing strikes...". U.S. Retrieved 2018-09-16. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 "Australia vulnerable to 'full-blown trade war' as US-China tension deepens". The Age. 
  13. "Trump wants $12 billion in aid to U.S. farmers suffering from trade war". Reuters. Retrieved 25 July 2018. 
  14. Rappeport, Alan; Swanson, Ana (May 10, 2019). "Trump Renews Trade War as China Talks End Without a Deal" – via 
  15. Deng, Chao (May 13, 2019). "China Hits Back With Tariffs on $60 Billion in U.S. Goods" – via 
  16. Rooney, Kate (May 13, 2019). "US trade office gets ready to impose tariffs on another $300 billion of Chinese imports". CNBC. 
  17. Swanson, Ana; Thrush, Glenn (May 23, 2019). "Trump Gives Farmers $16 Billion in Aid Amid Prolonged China Trade War" – via 
  18. Rappeport, Alan (July 25, 2019). "U.S. Rolls Out More Farm Aid as Soy Growers Urge Trade Cease-Fire" – via 
  19. "Australia exempted from US tariffs on steel and aluminium". SBS News. Retrieved 2018-09-16. 
  20. 20.0 20.1 "US reaches deal to lift steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico". CNBC. 17 May 2019. 
  21. Karni, Annie; Swanson, Ana (May 30, 2019). "Trump Says U.S. Will Hit Mexico With Tariffs on All Goods" – via 
  22. 22.0 22.1 "Trump claims he’s reached deal with Mexico". Axios. 7 June 2019. Retrieved 8 June 2019. 
  23. 23.0 23.1 Liesman, Steve (May 16, 2019). "Trump's tariffs are equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in decades". CNBC. 
  24. 24.0 24.1 Keshner, Andrew. "Trump’s escalating trade war with China could wipe out benefits from his tax reform". MarketWatch. 
  25. 25.0 25.1 "Trump Tariffs Could Wipe Out Tax Cuts for Many Households". 
  26. 26.0 26.1 "For Many Households, Trump’s Tariffs Could Wipe Out The Benefits of the TCJA". Tax Policy Center. May 14, 2019. 
  27. Schlesinger, Jacob M. (November 15, 2018). "Trump Forged His Ideas on Trade in the 1980s—And Never Deviated". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 15, 2018. 
  28. "Donald Trump Says He Favors Big Tariffs on Chinese Exports". The New York Times. Retrieved March 20, 2018. 
  29. "Donald Trump Says NAFTA Was the Worst Trade Deal the U.S. Ever Signed". Fortune Magazine. Retrieved March 20, 2018. 
  30. "Read Donald Trump's Speech on Trade". Time. Retrieved March 21, 2018. 
  31. "Donald Trump vows to cancel Trans-Pacific Partnership as president, puts NAFTA on notice". The Washington Times. Retrieved November 15, 2016. 
  32. "TPP’s Death Won’t Help the American Middle Class". The Atlantic. Retrieved January 22, 2017. 
  33. "Presidential Memorandum Regarding Withdrawal of the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Agreement". The White House. Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  34. "Trump executive order pulls out of TPP trade deal". BBC News. Retrieved January 23, 2017. Mr Trump's executive order on TPP is seen as mainly symbolic since the deal was never ratified by a divided US Congress. 
  35. "What Is Nafta, and How Might Trump Change It?". The New York Times. Retrieved April 5, 2017. 
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 Appelbaum, Binyamin (March 10, 2016). "On Trade, Donald Trump Breaks With 200 Years of Economic Orthodoxy". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  37. 37.0 37.1 Needham, Vicki (July 24, 2016). "Trump suggests leaving WTO over import tax proposal". Retrieved July 24, 2016. 
  38. 38.0 38.1 Daly, Michael (August 8, 2015). "Donald Trump Won’t Eat Oreos Because They’re Too Mexican Now". Daily Beast. Retrieved April 9, 2016. 
  39. Schoen, John W. (October 1, 2018). "New Trump trade deal leaves NAFTA largely intact". 
  40. "Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter" (PDF). 
  41. "Here Is What Donald Trump Wants To Do In His First 100 Days". Retrieved March 27, 2018. 
  42. "Chipping away at Lighthizer’s confirmation". POLITICO. Retrieved March 27, 2018. 
  43. "Search Bills in Congress -". Retrieved March 27, 2018. 
  44. "Trump's talk big, act small White House". Axios. Retrieved March 27, 2018. 
  45. Golshan, Tara. "Why Trump Can Raise Tariffs Without Congress". Retrieved June 8, 2018. 
  46. Partington, Richard (2018-06-19). "Why is Donald Trump threatening more tariffs – and what next?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2018-12-23. 
  47. 47.0 47.1 "Why the trade deficit is getting bigger — despite all of Trump’s promises". The Washington Post. 2018. 
  48. Tankersley, Jim (2018-11-29). "How Tariffs Work, and Why China Won’t See a Bill". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2018-12-23. 
  49. "AP FACT CHECK: Economists say Trump off on tariffs’ impact". 2018-12-05. Retrieved 2018-12-23. 
  50. Vox: Why Trump can raise steel tariffs without Congress, march 8, 2018
  51. Gerard N. Magliocca: If the Chamber of Commerce is listening ... Balkinization, 31 May 2019
  52. Eckhouse, Brian; Natter, Ari; Martin, Christopher (January 23, 2018). "President Trump Slaps Tariffs on Solar Panels in Major Blow to Renewable Energy". Time Magazine. Retrieved January 23, 2018. 
  53. DiChristopher, Tom (January 23, 2018). "Trump's solar tariffs could put the brakes on rapid job growth in renewable energy". CNBC. Retrieved January 23, 2018. 
  54. 54.0 54.1 54.2 54.3 "President Trump Approves Relief for U.S. Washing Machine and Solar Cell Manufacturers" (Press release). Office of the United States Trade Representative. January 2018. 
  55. "China blasts Trump's new trade tariffs". CNNMoney. January 23, 2018. Retrieved January 23, 2018. 
  56. Swanson, Ana; Plumer, Brad (2018). "Trump Slaps Steep Tariffs on Foreign Washing Machines and Solar Products". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  57. 57.0 57.1 "Large Residential Washers: Investigation No. TA-201-076" (PDF). Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  58. Kline, Daniel B. "Trump Tariffs: Is Now the Time to Buy a Washing Machine?". The Motley Fool. Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  59. Gillespie, Patrick. "Washing machines are going to get more expensive". CNNMoney. Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  60. "Trump declares his trade war: targets steel, aluminum". Axios. Retrieved March 1, 2018. 
  61. Damian Paletta, Trump insists ‘trade wars are good, and easy to win’ after vowing new tariffs, Washington Post (March 2, 2018).
  62. Jim Brunsden and Shawn Donnan, US grants last-minute exemptions to looming steel tariffs, Financial Times (March 22, 2018).
  63. "Trump imposes steel and aluminum tariffs on the E.U., Canada and Mexico". Washington Post. May 31, 2018. 
  64. Lynch, David J. "Trump imposes tariffs on closest allies; Mexico and Europe announce retaliation". Retrieved May 31, 2018. 
  65. 65.0 65.1 65.2 65.3 "Trump Lifts Metal Tariffs and Delays Auto Levies, Limiting Global Trade Fight". New York Times. 17 May 2019. 
  66. "Roy Green: The first shots of a broad international trade war?". 
  67. Song Jung-a (March 26, 2018). "South Korea secures US steel tariff exemption". Financial Times. Retrieved May 12, 2019. 
  68. "Subscribe to The Australian - Newspaper home delivery, website, iPad, iPhone & Android apps". 
  69. 1943-, Woodward, Bob,. Fear : Trump in the White House (First Simon & Schuster hardcover ed.). New York. p. 249. ISBN 9781501175510. OCLC 1046982157. 
  70. 70.0 70.1 Shannon Togawa Mercer & Matthew Kahn, America Trades Down: The Legal Consequences of President Trump's Tariffs, Lawfare (March 13, 2018).
  71. Tom Miles, Trump's extraordinary tariffs, Reuters (March 5, 2018).
  72. "China initiates WTO dispute complaint against US tariffs on steel, aluminium products". April 9, 2018. 
  73. Rankin, Jennifer (June 1, 2018). "EU opens WTO case against Trump's steel and aluminium tariffs". the Guardian. Retrieved June 2, 2018. 
  74. Trump, Donald J. [realDonaldTrump] (June 9, 2018). "PM Justin Trudeau of Canada acted so meek and mild during our @G7 meetings only to give a news conference after I left saying that, “US Tariffs were kind of insulting” and he “will not be pushed around.” Very dishonest & weak. Our Tariffs are in response to his of 270% on dairy!" (Tweet) – via Twitter. 
  75. Sanchez, Luis. "Trump rips 'meek and mild' Trudeau for criticizing US tariffs". The Hill. Retrieved June 10, 2018. 
  76. Chait, Jonathan. "Trump Confesses Illegal Motive, Blows Up Legal Basis for His Trade War". New York. Retrieved June 11, 2018. 
  77. 77.0 77.1 Krugman, Paul; Wells, Robin (2005). Microeconomics. Worth. ISBN 0-7167-5229-8. 
  78. "Steel and Aluminum Tariffs". Retrieved March 12, 2018. 
  79. 79.0 79.1 79.2 "President Donald Trump wants tariffs on steel and aluminium". The Economist. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  80. "Will Steel Tariffs Put U.S. Jobs at Risk? | Econofact". Econofact. February 26, 2018. Retrieved March 9, 2018. ...because steel is an input into so many other products, the measures more likely will trade off jobs saved in steel industry against job losses in other manufacturing industries. The losses could be substantial because the number of jobs in U.S. industries that use steel or inputs made of steel outnumber the number of jobs involved in the production of steel by roughly 80 to 1. 
  81. 81.0 81.1 81.2 Irwin, Neil (March 1, 2018). "The Real Risks of Trump’s Steel and Aluminum Tariffs". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  82. Kitroeff, Natalie; Swanson, Ana (March 3, 2018). "Trump’s Tariff Plan Leaves Blue-Collar Winners and Losers". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  83. "Struggling US steel mills fear hammer blow to jobs". Financial Times. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  84. Timmons, Heather (March 5, 2018). "Five US jobs will be lost for every new one created by Trump’s steel tariffs". Quartz (publication). Retrieved March 7, 2018. 
  85. Lynch, David J.; Dewey, Caitlin (March 2, 2018). "Trump finally gets his tariffs — and much of the world recoils". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  86. the rationales are named in Trump's Presidential proclamation (
  87. Bown, Chad P. (March 1, 2018). "Analysis | Trump has announced massive aluminum and steel tariffs. Here are 5 things you need to know.". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  88. 88.0 88.1 Goodman, Peter S. (March 23, 2018). "Trump Just Pushed the World Trade Organization Toward Irrelevance". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 23, 2018. 
  89. "Donald Trump, Steel Tariffs, and the Costs of Chaos". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  90. Bown, Chad P. (March 9, 2018). "What We Do and Don’t Know After Trump’s Tariff Announcement". Harvard Business Review. Retrieved March 9, 2018. 
  91. Pete Schroeder, Forty-five U.S. trade groups urge Trump to avoid tariffs against China, Reuters (March 18, 2018).
  92. Lucas, Amelia (2018-07-11). "National Retail Federation CEO says Trump's tariffs 'aren't going to work,' will raise prices". CNBC. Retrieved 2018-09-12. 
  93. Thomas, Lauren (2018-04-04). "Trump tariffs on appliances, electronics will hit American consumers, retailers warn". CNBC. Retrieved 2018-09-12. 
  94. "Terms of Service Violation". Retrieved 2018-09-12. 
  95. "G.M. to Idle Plants and Cut Thousands of Jobs as Sales Slow". New York Times. 
  96. "GM Canada president says electric vehicles are the future — but they won't be made in Oshawa". CBC. 
  97. "Trump blasts GM plan to cut plants, says he was 'tough' on CEO Mary Barra". USA Today. 
  98. "Trump's steel tariffs are earning him cheers from Democrats and unions". Associated Press. 
  99. Britzky, Haley (March 1, 2018). "The response to Trump's tariffs, from Congress, businesses, and abroad". Axios. 
  100. Berman, Russell (March 6, 2018). "Republicans can't stop Trump's left-wing drift on trade". The Atlantic. 
  101. Williams, Joe. "Republican Reaction To Trade Taxes: Fast, Furious, Negative". Roll Call. 
  102. 102.0 102.1 Lindsey McPherson, Ryan: Congress Won’t Pass Tariff Legislation Trump Wouldn't Sign, Roll Call (June 6, 2018).
  103. Susan Davis, Congressional Republicans Unlikely To Act To Counter Trump On Tariffs, All Things Considered (March 8, 2018).
  104. Parnes, Amie; Carney, Jordain (March 9, 2018). "Dems tread cautiously on Trump's tariffs". The Hill. 
  105. Cornwell, Susan (March 2, 2018). "Rust-belt Democrats praise Trump's threatened metals tariffs". Reuters. 
  106. Decker, Cathleen (March 6, 2018). "Republican congressional leaders push Trump to cancel or narrow his tariff plan, but president appears unmoved". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 8, 2018. 
  107. "Pelosi Statement on President Trump’s Steel & Aluminum Tariffs". Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi. March 8, 2018. Retrieved March 21, 2018. 
  108. 108.0 108.1 Schlesinger, Jacob M.; Nicholas, Peter; Radnofsky, Louise (March 2, 2018). "Trump to Impose Steep Aluminum and Steel Tariffs". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved March 3, 2018. 
  109. Palmer, Doug (March 7, 2018). "Why steel tariffs failed when Bush was president". Politico. Retrieved March 8, 2018. 
  110. Mangan, Dan; Pramuk, Jacob (March 6, 2018). "Gary Cohn resigns as Trump's top economic advisor". CNBC. Retrieved March 6, 2018. 
  111. "U.S. Voters Oppose Steel, Aluminum Tariffs". Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. March 7, 2018. Retrieved March 7, 2018. 
  112. "Over 600 U.S. companies urge Trump to resolve trade dispute with...". June 13, 2019 – via 
  114. 114.0 114.1 Diamond, Jeremy. "Trump hits China with tariffs, heightening concerns of global trade war". CNN. Retrieved March 22, 2018. 
  115. "Trump takes 1st step on tariffs on Chinese imports, says penalties will make US 'a much stronger, much richer nation'". CNBC. March 22, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2018. 
  116. Egan, Matt (March 22, 2018). "Dow plunges 724 points as trade war fears rock Wall Street". CNN Money. Retrieved March 23, 2018. 
  117. "Stocks dive as sanctions on China fuel trade-war fears; Dow drops 700-plus points". Los Angeles Times. March 22, 2018. Archived from the original on March 23, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2018. 
  118. "All 128 U.S. Products China Is Enacting Tariffs On". Fortune. April 2, 2018. 
  119. "China Slaps Tariffs on 128 U.S. Products, Including Wine, Pork and Pipes". New York Times. April 1, 2018. 
  120. Merelli, Annalisa. "China tariffs: The complete list of 128 affected good class of goods — Quartz". Retrieved April 3, 2018. 
  121. Kuo, Lily (April 2, 2018). "China retaliates against Trump tariffs with levy on US food imports". the Guardian. Retrieved April 3, 2018. 
  122. hermesauto (April 4, 2018). "US publishes list of 1,300 Chinese goods worth US$50b set to be targeted by tariffs". The Straits Times. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  123. Swanson, Ana (April 3, 2018). "White House Unveils Tariffs on 1,300 Chinese Products". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  124. Office of the United States Trade Representative (April 3, 2018). "Notice of Determination and Request for Public Comment Concerning Proposed Determination of Action Pursuant to Section 301: China’s Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation" (PDF). 
  125. Tan, Huileng; Mody, Seema (April 4, 2018). "China’s ambassador to the US explains why the country is striking back". CNBC. Retrieved May 12, 2019. 
  126. "China imposes additional tariffs on U.S. products worth 50 bln USD". Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  127. "As China Fires Back in Trade War, Here Are the Winners And Losers". April 4, 2018. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  128. Rauhala, Emily (April 4, 2018). "China fires back at Trump with the threat of tariffs on 106 U.S. products, including soybeans". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  129. CNN, Maegan Vazquez and Abby Phillip,. "Trump pushes back against market fears of trade war". CNN. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  130. Tobey, John S. "The Trade War Is Here - Prepare For A Bear Market". Forbes. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  131. Noack, Rick (April 4, 2018). "Analysis | How trade wars end and why Trump’s will be different". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  132. "Donald J. Trump on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved April 4, 2018. 
  133. Aiello, Chloe (April 5, 2018). "Trump proposes $100 billion in additional tariffs on Chinese products". CNBC. Retrieved April 6, 2018. 
  134. "Trump Escalates Trade Tensions With Call for New China Tariffs". April 5, 2018. Retrieved April 6, 2018. 
  135. "Facing threat of tariffs, China buyers cancel orders for U.S. soybeans". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved May 31, 2018. 
  136. Business, P. M. N. (June 15, 2018). "Trump’s tariffs: What they are and how China is responding - Financial Post". 
  137. "Statement By U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer on Section 301 Action | United States Trade Representative". Retrieved 2018-07-12. 
  138. "Huge Break for Auto Companies as China Removes Ownership Caps". IndustryWeek. April 17, 2018. 
  139. Clover, Charles; Feng, Emily; Sherry Fei Ju (April 17, 2018). "China makes trade concession to US by opening car industry to foreigners". Financial Times. Retrieved May 12, 2019. 
  140. 140.0 140.1 "Who pays for US tariffs on Chinese goods? You do". Politifact. 14 May 2019. Retrieved 18 May 2019. 
  141. Trump, Donald J. (November 29, 2018). "Billions of Dollars are pouring into the coffers of the U.S.A. because of the Tariffs being charged to China, and there is a long way to go. If companies don’t want to pay Tariffs, build in the U.S.A. Otherwise, lets just make our Country richer than ever before!". 
  142. Bryan, Bob (January 3, 2019). "Trump says the Treasury is taking in 'MANY billions of dollars' from the tariffs on China. The only problem is that US companies are paying the price.". Business Insider. Retrieved May 12, 2019. 
  143. Baker, Peter; Bradsher, Keith (June 29, 2019). "Trump and Xi Agree to Restart Trade Talks, Avoiding Escalation in Tariff War" – via 
  144. Rappeport, Alan; Bradsher, Keith (June 30, 2019). "The U.S. and China Are Talking Trade Again. But They’re Still Far Apart." – via 
  145. Swanson, Ana; Bradsher, Keith (July 10, 2019). "China and U.S. Differ Over Agricultural Purchases Trump Boasted About" – via 
  146. "President Donald J. Trump is Fulfilling His Promise on The U.S. - Korea Free Trade Agreement and on National Security". The White House. Retrieved March 28, 2018. 
  147. CNBC (March 25, 2018). "US exempts South Korea from steel tariffs, but imposes import quota". CNBC. Retrieved March 28, 2018. 
  148. Shear, Michael D.; Rappeport, Alan (March 27, 2018). "Trump Secures Trade Deal With South Korea Ahead of Nuclear Talks". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 28, 2018. 
  149. "83 FR 25849 - ADJUSTING IMPORTS OF ALUMINUM INTO THE UNITED STATES" (PDF). Retrieved 2018-09-11. 
  150. see also Economy of South Korea#Trade statistics
  151. Wang, Christine (March 1, 2018). "Canada, European Union pledge countermeasures against US steel, aluminum tariffs". CNBC. Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  152. Jacobs, Jennifer; Deaux, Joe (March 1, 2018). "Trump Expected to Announce Stiff Steel, Aluminum Tariffs". Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  153. Spangler, Todd. "Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau slams Trump on tariffs". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved June 1, 2018. 
  154. Holland, Steve; Gibson, Ginger (March 2, 2018). "Trump to impose steep tariffs on steel, aluminum; stokes trade war fears". Reuters. Retrieved May 12, 2019. 
  155. "China Is Raising Tariffs on the United States and Lowering Them for Everybody Else". PIIE. June 24, 2019. 
  156. "European Commission responds to the US restrictions on steel and aluminium affecting the EU" (Press release). European Commission. March 1, 2018. 
  157. Emre Peker, European Union Launches WTO Challenge to U.S. Tariffs, Wall Street Journal (June 1, 2018).
  158. 158.0 158.1 Shannon Van Sant & Bill Chappell, EU Tariffs Take Effect, Retaliating For Trump's Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum, NPR (June 22, 2018).
  159. Rappeport, Alan (June 25, 2018). "Harley-Davidson, Blaming E.U. Tariffs, Will Move Some Production Out of U.S.". New York Times. Retrieved May 12, 2019. 
  160. "Trump trade war: India announces tariffs on U.S. products". Axios. 16 June 2019. 
  161. Ana Swanson & Jim Tankersley, Mexico, Hitting Back, Imposes Tariffs on $3 Billion Worth of U.S. Goods, New York Times (June 5, 2018).
  162. Lane, Charles (October 21, 2015). "Donald Trump’s contempt for the free market". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  163. Rosenfeld, Everett (March 10, 2016). "Trump trade plan is dangerous: Economists". CNBC. Retrieved March 2, 2018. 
  164. Trump, Donald J. (March 3, 2018). "If the E.U. wants to further increase their already massive tariffs and barriers on U.S. companies doing business there, we will simply apply a Tax on their Cars which freely pour into the U.S. They make it impossible for our cars (and more) to sell there. Big trade imbalance!". @realDonaldTrump. Retrieved March 3, 2018. 
  165. Byrd, Analysis by Haley. "Trump says foreign cars are a national security threat. Will Congress stop him in before it's too late?". CNN. Retrieved 2019-06-25. 
  166. "Trump declares some auto imports pose national security threat". Reuters. 2019-05-18. Retrieved 2019-06-25. 
  167. "Why the Trump administration is going after auto imports: Asian Trade Centre". Retrieved 2019-06-25. 
  168. Karni, Annie; Swanson, Ana; Shear, Michael D. (May 30, 2019). "Trump Says U.S. Will Hit Mexico With 5% Tariffs on All Goods" – via 
  169. "Trump says U.S. to impose 5 percent tariff on all Mexican imports beginning June 10 in dramatic escalation of border clash". Washington Post. 
  170. "Trump Pushes USMCA Approval Plan in Move That Irks Pelosi". 
  171. 171.0 171.1 Salama, Vivian; Mauldin, William; Lucey, Catherine (June 1, 2019). "Trump’s Threat of Tariffs on Mexico Prompts Outcry" – via 
  172. "Trump defies close advisers in deciding to threaten Mexico with disruptive tariffs". Washington Post. 
  173. Swanson, Ana (May 31, 2019). "Trump’s Tariff Threat Sends Mexico, Lawmakers and Businesses Scrambling" – via 
  174. Karni, Annie; Swanson, Ana; Shear, Michael D. (May 30, 2019). "Trump Says U.S. Will Hit Mexico With 5% Tariffs on All Goods" – via 
  175. "Mexico Never Agreed to Farm Deal With U.S., Contradicting Trump". June 7, 2019 – via 
  176. Shear, Michael D.; Haberman, Maggie (June 8, 2019). "Mexico Agreed to Take Border Actions Months Before Trump Announced Tariff Deal" – via 
  177. Baker, Peter (June 9, 2019). "Trump, Attacking Times Article, Claims Mexico Deal Has Secret Provisions" – via 
  178. "Trump says there’s more in Mexico deal but doesn’t say what". Politico. 9 June 2019. 
  179. Farley, Robert (May 14, 2019). "Economists: Tariffs Not Boosting GDP". 
  180. Congressional Research Service, Trump Administration Tariff Actions: Frequently Asked Questions, February 2019 —
  181. Sarkar, Shrutee (March 13, 2018). "Economists united: Trump tariffs won't help the economy". Reuters. 
  182. Rushe, Dominic (May 3, 2018). "More than 1,000 economists warn Trump his trade views echo 1930s errors" – via 
  183. Zarroli, Jim (March 6, 2019). "Despite Trump's Promises, The Trade Deficit Is Only Getting Wider". NPR. National Public Radio. 
  184. Fajgelbaum, Pablo D.; Goldberg, Pinelopi K.; Kennedy, Patrick J.; Khandelwal, Amit K. "The Return to Protectionism". National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved 2019-05-08. 
  185. 185.0 185.1 Donnan, Shaun (March 4, 2019). "Evidence Grows That Trump's Trade Wars Are Hitting U.S. Economy". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 2019-05-08. 
  186. Amiti, Mary; Redding, Stephen J.; Weinstein, David E. "The Impact of the 2018 Trade War on U.S. Prices and Welfare" (PDF). Princeton University. Retrieved 2019-05-08. 
  187. Flaaen, Aaron B; Hortaçsu, Ali; Tintelnot, Felix (2019). "The Production Relocation and Price Effects of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Washing Machines". doi:10.3386/w25767. 
  188. 188.0 188.1 Long, Heather (2019). "Trump’s steel tariffs cost U.S. consumers $900,000 for every job created, experts say". The Washington Post. 
  189. Tankersley, Jim (June 3, 2019). "Trump’s Tariffs Could Nullify Tax Cut, Clouding Economic Picture" – via 
  190. Fitzgerald, Maggie (May 31, 2019). "Trump's trade wars have cost the stock market $5 trillion and counting: Deutsche Bank". CNBC. 
  191. "The Escalating Toll of Trump's Taxes on Trade". National Taxpayers Union. 
  192. 192.0 192.1 "Why you should never start a trade war with an autocracy". The Economist. 2019-04-27. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2019-04-28. 
  193. 193.0 193.1 Fetzer, Thiemo; Schwarz, Carlo (2019-04-23). "Tariffs and politics: Evidence from Trump’s trade wars". Retrieved 2019-04-28. 
  194. 194.0 194.1 Schwarz, Carlo; Fetzer, Thiemo (2019-03-08). "Tariffs and Politics: Evidence from Trump's Trade Wars". Rochester, NY. 
  195. "Mexico Solved? Not So Fast…Significant Damage Remains". Asian Trade Centre. Retrieved 2019-06-21.